Tuesday, 24 November 2015

Work vs. Leisure (Ragged Dick Presentation Script)


Ragged Dick has a variety of themes which can be extracted from the characters and events in the novel. One of the themes which can be considered major is 'Work vs. Leisure'. Leisure can be defined as ‘time when one is free from the demands of work’ or the ‘use of free time for enjoyment’. Throughout the novel the characters in Ragged Dick are either working or occupying their free time, as a result of this Alger encourages “the merits of honesty, hard work, and cheerfulness in adversity.”[1]

The plot is a key element when discussing the theme of 'Work vs. Leisure'. Ragged Dick is a homeless fourteen year old boy, who is known for, his honesty. The novel emphasises Ragged Dick’s motivation to become ‘spectable’. Alger implements many literary tools to clarify this point. For example, the character development of the protagonist Ragged Dick. Dick’s character is developed significantly from the start of the novel. At the beginning the reader learns that one of Dick’s ‘faults’ was his ‘extravagance’. Dick spent his free time at the ‘Old Bowery Theatre’, ‘Tony Pastor’s’ and on the occasion a ‘gambling house’ which was sometimes crowded with ‘juvenile gamesters’. These past discrepancies meant that whatever ‘he managed to earn during the day… was generally spent before morning.’ However, this all changes when he meets Frank Whitney. This character development interrelate with Dick’s mood and point of view, “I mean to turn over a new leaf, and try to grow up ‘spectable.” This is also a vital part of the plot, as the reader sees a clear change in character, as Dick begins to save his money, and is “willin’ to work hard”. Alger makes a clear link between work and success, he uses Dick to show the advantage of morally moving away from leisure and towards work. This is further developed when Mr. Whitney tells Dick to, “avoid extravagance”. Dick’s outlook on life changes from this, instead of being ‘content to live on from day to day without a penny ahead’, he begins to save his money in the bank. Ragged Dick’s story is not necessarily a ‘rags to riches’ story, as his main aim is to be respected. Dick ‘despite some bad habits (smoking, swearing, theatre going) is in essence a reputable boy stuck in disreputable circumstances’[2]. Therefore, it would be more appropriate to say this story is one of ‘rags to respectability’.  

Similar to Dick, Henry Fosdick is driven by the prospect of wanting a better quality of life and the only way he can achieve this is through work. However, there is a contrast between Henry and Dick, Henry is a more timid character and therefore does not earn as much money as Dick from ‘shoe shining’, this lack of opportunity leads him to pursue another career. During the time when ‘business slackened’, Henry got copies of the “Morning Herald” and “Sun”. Through many job applications and failures Henry still worked and looked for a better job, despite being ‘discouraged’. After, seeing one advertisement he was ‘determined to make an application’. Henry has a clear determination to work and although he had once lived in ‘comfort’ he does not shy away from his work duties compared to other characters. Henry’s values are the same as Dick’s they both want to be honourable and attain respectable jobs which will give them good pay. As he becomes more prominent after gaining a new job, Henry’s character is also developed in a way.

Compared to characters such as Henry Fosdick, Johnny Nolan’s character is stuck in the ‘shoe shining’ business. Paralleled to the other character’s Johnny Nolan has no significant character development. However, Alger uses this character as a tool to show what happens if you do not work or change your lifestyle and how you will be stuck in the same place/job. Whereas, Dick is ‘energetic and on the alert for business’, Johnny is “lazy” and doesn’t try. This can also be seen when Dick and Johnny are talking about the farm Johnny had lived on. When Dick asks if Johnny liked it, he replies “No, I had to wake up too early”, Alger adds frequent comments about Johnny’s laziness and lack of “ambition”. In addition to this, readers learn that Johnny went to school once, but decided it was “too hard work” and decided to give up. Johnny has a passive view towards work, which can link him to characters such has Jim Travis who has ‘no fancy for work’. Alger’s tone when conveying these two explicit characters is the opposite of how he expresses Dick. In Chapter Twenty-Two, Alger gives the reader an insight into how dishonest and devious Travis is.  His aggressive nature is further developed in Chapter Twenty-Three, when he gets caught by the Police, ““Curse you!” said Travis, scowling vindictively. “Wait till I get free. See if I don’t fix you.”” Travis’ horrific outburst is a clear sign of how depleting life can get when you don’t work. Here, Alger is making a statement on how the lack of work can lead to a bad lifestyle and criminal behaviour.

Both Mr. Whitney and his nephew Frank come from respectable backgrounds and work hard. Mr. Whitney and his nephew Frank are introduced to the readers in Chapter Three and have a higher position in society than the leading character Dick. However, Alger uses these characters as an indication of what might become of Dick if he were to work hard and follow their advice. As, Mr. Whitney has a modest background, which his nephew explains to Dick, Mr. Whitney “came to New York as a young man he was a teacher,” he also states that teachers are “not generally rich.” This gives an insight into how hard Mr. Whitney had to work to get to the point he is at today. He also worked his way up and “determined in the beginning: that he would be strictly honourable in all his dealings.” This is an admirable quality which a working man should have. When Frank says, “If there is a chance for him, Dick, there is a chance for you”, this statement potentially changes the trajectory of the story as Dick realises that he could have a better life. In addition to this, Mr. Whitney states what he does during his leisure hours, he improves himself by studying and was able to “acquire a large part of the knowledge” which he now possesses. The prospect of learning more and working harder seems admirable to Dick as it will help him achieve his goal of being respected. Alger makes it clear that it takes a lot of effort and hard work, during both working and leisure time. Also all this hard work will help achieve the ‘rags to riches’ myth.  





[1] Horatio Alger Jr.; Bode, Carl (Ed.) (1985). "Introduction". Ragged Dick and Struggling Upward. Penguin Books. pp. ix–xii

Saturday, 21 November 2015

Blog Task for meeting in Week 10 (24 November)


Everyone will give a 10 minute (strict!) assessed presentation on an aspect of Ragged Dick.

Your blog post this week will be to post the script for your presentation. 

Krishnaa - Work vs Leisure
Alfie - Honesty vs Being Streetwise
Joe - Obedience vs Inventiveness
Isobelle - Friendship vs Rivalry
Zoe - Youth vs Experience

 

Tuesday, 17 November 2015

12 Years a Slave Review

12 Years a Slave offers a brutal and very honest true life account of the story of Solomon Northup, played by Chiwetel Ejiofor. The film follows his story after being captured as a free man and sold into the slave trade. As the slaves were rarely able to talk a lot of the emotions in this film are communicated particularly through Ejiofor's facial expressions, which are especially powerful. One moment that stands out is the funeral scene where Ejiofor perfectly encapsulates the emotion and desperation of the scene as the realisation dawns on Solomon that he is stuck for the rest of his life. The film focuses particularly on the harsh conditions that the slaves lived in under the violent rule of their masters, illustrated in this movie by Michael Fassbender's portrayal of Epps. 12 Years a Slave also focuses on the treatment of female slaves and how they were often viewed as sexual objects by the slave masters. One especially striking aspect of the film is the beautiful cinematography, I believe this was consciously done, not just for artistic purposes, but also to juxtapose the gorgeous landscapes with the depraved cruelty of the humans that inhabit it. In conclusion, 12 Years a Slave is one of the best slave narrative films of all time. Its honest depiction of the vile way in which slaves were kept and abused, is incredibly portrayed by all of those involved. It never holds back and is at times an uncomfortable watch, however it is a completely necessary one.

12 Years a Slave



‘12 Years a Slave’ is an adaption of the memoir by Solomon Northup. Directed by Steve McQueen it gives a brutally honest insight into slavery in the time before The Civil War.




Solomon Northup was an African-American from upstate New York who born a free man. He grew up with an education and had a career as a violinist. He was abducted from Washington and sold into slavery where he was forced to endure physical and emotional torture for the next twelve years. 




Solomon Northup’s story shows the many nightmares African-Americans had to endure with nobody coming to their aid for all those years. The physical and mental torture, the anguish of being separated from loved ones, the rape of your mind and body. These are just a few of the atrocities that happened on a day-to-day basis for these human beings and that still go on today in the slave trade around the world. 




Eliza is a character that really shows the lack of sympathy African-Americans were shown in the time of slavery. After being ripped apart from her children Mrs Ford declares to Eliza “Something to eat and some rest; your children will soon enough be forgotten.” As if she was little more than an animal who has no lasting love for her children. When it shows that her grief for losing her children is unending the Fords send her back like some faulty goods. 




Patsey’s character hits home the terror female slaves had to endure. The never ending sexual torture by Mr Epps and the hatred afforded to her because of this from Mrs Epps. Mrs Epps never takes into consideration that Mr Epps affections towards her were unreciprocated but instead considers Patsey to be an instigator in it. This shows how many slave owners wives considered the female slaves in these times.


While Solomon Northup’s story gets resolved there are many that have an open ending. Does Patsey ever escape her torturous life with the Epps? Does Eliza ever see her children again? These are both unlikely to happen but there is always hope. As this is what Solomon’s story gives in the end. There is hope to become free. After all, what were the chances of Solomon ever finding his freedom again?

12 Years a Slave: Brutal and Unforgiving

’12 Years a Slave’ directed by Steve McQueen is a 2013 period drama and an adaptation of the narrative memoir ‘Twelve Years a Slave’ by Solomon Northrup. It is poignant in its depiction of slavery in the 19th Century United States, especially since many textbooks in schools have been erasing slavery and the lasting impact it has had on the U.S.A.

Solomon Northrup (played by Chiwetel Ejiofor) was a free African-American man who worked as a violinist before being kidnapped and forced into slavery. His journey highlights how racism and xenophobia were rife in the United States, and even free men were not truly free as they could be sold into slavery fairly easily. 

However, I personally found Patsey (Lupita Nyong’o) a far more interesting character than Solomon. Its her story that emotionally affected me the most. She was born into slavery, and the film does not provide her character with any resolution, as at the end of the film she is seen still as property of her master, Edwin Epps (Michael Fassbender). In particular, the whipping scene in which Epps whips Patsey due to her being given soap by a neighbour, is poignant in depicting the unreasonable and brutal nature of punishments given to slaves.

McQueen's use of rape as a plot device is problematic and unnecessary.  
'Because rape is widely acknowledged as a Very Serious Topic, there’s also a tendency to treat rape scenes as a means to be edgy or shocking.'
 Whilst it is realistic, and would have occurred frequently during slavery, the films depictions of rape are troubling. The scene between Solomon and an unnamed woman seemed to have no purpose, or at least a very subtle one. On the other hand, the scene between Epps and Patsey shows the dynamic between master and slave, and how disturbing the relationship power dynamic is. However, this could have been avoided, as shown with 'Mad Max' (2015). In this film, rape scenes are not shown, but simply believed to have happened through character testimony. This method has been viewed positively and remains just as hard hitting, whilst preventing unnecessary sexualisation of female characters.
‘It is troubling that McQueen and Ridley include a fictitious sexualised woman while excluding a temporarily free black woman on the run, that they use fictional elements to emphasise the vulnerability of the already exposed Patsy, and that they use Eliza’s body to grant Robert a more dignified death.’
This quote reinforces the idea that women are exploited as plot devices in the film. McQueen created a fictional arc for Robert in which he died trying to protect Eliza from being raped by their white captors. Whereas in the original memoir this did not occur, Robert died of smallpox.


12 Years a Slave's portrayal of slavery shows exactly how it was - brutal and unforgiving - but does so with the unnecessary use of the female body as a plot device. However, its explicit violence can shock an audience into remembering and acknowledging the suffering that was experienced by slaves in the United States. 

Monday, 16 November 2015

12 Years a Slave


In 2013, ‘12 Years a Slave’ was released by director Steve McQueen. This historical drama was based upon Solomon Northup’s slave narrative. The film adaption of Solomon Northup’s, ‘12 Years a Slave’ focuses on the authentication of slavery. Although the emancipation of slavery was over 150 years ago, the film depicts the brutal reality of slavery, from the excessive force used on the slaves to make them work to the mind-set they had developed due to these controlled exercises.

This review shall focus on the key aspects of slavery which are present in the film, such as the physical abuses which were used on slaves. McQueen stated that, “A lot of people didn’t want the movie to be made”, he said the reason behind this was, “people want to close their eyes on some subjects.”[1] Although, McQueen does stray away from the accounts which are in Solomon’s memoir, he manages to lift a veil and expose the truth behind slavery which many previous films failed to address. 

The conditions of slavery in the film, are key aspects which help to reveal the truth of how slaves were treated. These authentic representations of the reality of slavery help the modern world understand the lengths at which slaves had to go through to survive. ‘In general, treatment of slaves was characterised by degradation, rape, and brutality, and the lack of basic freedoms.’[2] 12 Years a Slaves most notable aspect was the use of the whip, the whip was repeatedly used on slaves throughout the film, as it was frequently used to force slaves to work. Solomon Northup (Chiwetel Ejiofor) repeatedly gets lashed whilst working at Edwin Epps’ (Michael Fassbender) cotton plantation. ‘But the lash was also employed for a range of offences or even in a cavalier fashion, in the hands of men and women to whom brutality was a way of life.’[3] This can be seen when Patsey (Lupita Nyong’o) is repeatedly lashed by Epps. Also in this scene, the audience can see how Mistress Epps (Sarah Paulson) resents Patsey and wishes for her husband to lash Patsey. As well as this physical abuse the slaves were subjected to ‘personal violations’. These violations can be considered to vary based on gender. Slaves were treated as possessions, therefore ‘they could be moved from one property to another.’2 Also slaves were sent to ‘distant, unknown, location[s], leaving behind family and loved ones’.2 This is clearly portrayed through the film, when Eliza (Adepero Oduye) is taken from her children. The film not only focuses on the male aspects of slavery but also the way in which slave women were exploited, both sexually and mentally. ‘Sexual abuse of slaves was partially rooted in the patriarchal Southern culture which treated all women …as property or chattel.’1 Multiple female characters are exploited in this way, as they were ‘pray to the predatory sexual habits of their master.’2 Eliza openly admits to Solomon that she had done “dishonourable things to survive”, although Eliza was her master’s mistress, she still recognised that she was still considered as his ‘property’. This can also be linked to Harriet (Alfre Woodard, who is also kept as her master’s mistress, however Harriet uses this to her advantage as she has a new social position. In comparison to Eliza and Harriet, Patsey is assaulted both by the master and the mistress. Epps much like other slave owners takes ‘little or no notice of…her age,’ but it is evident that Patsey is young, as she is seen making dolls. Patsey, unlike the other female characters, is the most violated not only by Epps, but by the jealous abusive nature Mistress Epps has towards her.

When Solomon is forced to change his name to ‘Platt’ it signifies the end of his freedom. Solomon has to also renounce all links to his past life, to survive and the only way he can do that is by relinquishing his birth name. Many other slaves were forced to do this, as they were kidnapped by slave traders. Norrece Jones states, ‘The issue of kidnapping in the North captures so many crucial aspects about the black experience in this country’, he also says that these kidnappings ‘reveal that even in a place of freedom, and even in a place where you had whites who were most progressive, from a black perspective, that they could be taken.'[4]

Ford (Benedict Cumberbatch) and Epps are the main slave owners of the play. Although Ford is a much kinder person many people have argued whether or not there is a difference between them. Compared to Ford, Epps takes a much more physical approach when it comes to his ownership of slaves, as he is a much more abusive person. However, Ford puts Tibeats (Paul Dano) in charge, who will whip the slaves to keep them in check. These two contrasting slave owners take different approaches when dealing with their slaves. This allows audiences to see that there were two types of slave owners during that period. Unfortunately, neither can be considered ‘good’ as they both owned slaves, Solomon seems content with living on the Ford plantation, but Eliza helps to put this thought into perspective when she states, “Ford is your opportunity?” Also, Solomon hits realisation when Ford states, “I hope it brings us both much joy over the years,” when handing Solomon a violin. Ford has no future plan of letting Solomon go free, even when Solomon tells him that he is in fact a free slave, as Solomon is Fords’ possession and he paid good money for him.

12 Years a Slave is a film which given a significant depiction of slavery 150 years after emancipation. Compared to other films which illustrate, this film whole-heartedly focuses on the different aspects of the life of the slaves. It focuses on the troubles which both female and male slaves went through and is able to give an insight into what slavery was like at the time.





[1] The Guardian: Provides news on different categories of life



[3] Understanding Slavery: A national learning initiative which teaches about slavery<http://www.understandingslavery.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=309&Itemid=221> accessed 14 November 2015 


[4] PBS: A educational website which helps broaden the mind of children